Posts Tagged ‘romans’

Romans 7 “Dead to the Law”

May 3, 2025

Romans 7 is probably one of the most misunderstood chapters in the New Testament. Paul’s use of personal pronouns (“I”, “me”, “my”) in the chapter cause confusion for some interpreters. We must remember that Paul as a trained rabbi was a master at logic and the usage of analogies. Romans is Paul’s masterpiece, and he has been careful to lay out a logical basis for justification by faith. The first three chapters lay out the need for justification. Since none are righteous, righteousness must come from somewhere (rather Someone!) else. That takes us to Romans 4 & 5. There, Paul lays out the case for justification by faith. He used Abraham (and David) as an example of one who was justified apart from works, apart from rituals (circumcision), and apart from the Law of Moses. After he has made his case for justification by faith, he moves on to sanctification. Hence, the issue of sanctification doesn’t come up until chapter six.

It will be helpful for us to remember at this point, the three tenses of salvation. We will use the letter “P” to help us remember the terminology. Justification is a legal declaration of righteousness. Justification delivers us from the penalty of sin. Sanctification is the middle-tense of salvation. If you’re a believer, that’s where you are right now. Sanctification deals with deliverance from the power of sin. The final tense of our salvation is glorification (we aren’t there yet!). Glorification ensures us deliverance from the presence of sin. Paul will deal with this in chapter 8 of Romans.

In chapter 6, Paul tells us how to be victorious over the power of sin in our lives. This doesn’t mean that we are ever sinless prior to glorification, but ideally, we are “sinning less.” There are three action verbs in Romans six, that are helpful. They are “know”, “reckon”, and “yield.” We must know the truth about our relationship to sin. Paul says that when we were baptized into Christ, we are now dead to sin (Rom 6:2a). Just as Christ was dead, buried, and raised to life, so are we (spiritually). We identify with Him. Our old man was crucified. We are now raised to new life. This spiritual truth is portrayed vividly in the believer’s water baptism. Death is portrayed as the believer goes down into the water. While under the water, the believer identifies with the burial of Christ. As he/she comes up out of the water, there is the symbolism of being raised to new life. We are also told we have to “reckon” this to be true. This word means to consider it to be so, because it is. It’s not enough for us to know this as fact. We must appropriate it in our daily lives. Finally, we are to yield to the Lord. One of the key verses in chapter six is verse 14:

Rom 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

Chapter six deals with the first half of the verse. Chapter 7 deals with the latter half of the verse. It is there that we begin chapter 7. The issue is the Law. What function (if any) does it have in regard to sanctification? If we may say it this way…chapter 6 tells us how to be sanctified. Chapter 7 tells us how not to be sanctified! There is one glaring omission in chapter 7, and this will be extremely helpful in our exegesis of the passage. You should notice that the topic of the Holy Spirit is conspicuously absent from Romans 7. This is a clue that we are not dealing with the Christian life. Despite what I have read in many commentaries (and countless sermons), Romans 7 does not describe the Christian’s struggle between the flesh and the Spirit (you can find that in Galatians 5). This chapter deals with the struggle between the flesh (sin nature) and the Law! They are vastly different topics and must not be confused!

Rom 7:1  Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 
Rom 7:2  For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 
Rom 7:3  So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 
Rom 7:4  Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God. 

In the previous chapter, Paul finished with the analogy of a slave and a master. Now he continues with another analogy. This time, he uses the analogy of marriage. It must be noted here that Paul is not dealing with the issue of marriage, he is using an analogy to explain the believer’s relationship with the Law of Moses. Under the Law, there were no provisions for a woman to initiate a divorce from her husband. She was “bound” to her husband as long as he was alive. Upon his death, however, she was free to be married to another man without committing the sin of adultery. In verse 4, Paul explains the analogy by saying that now the believer is dead to the Law! That’s our relationship with the Law of Moses; we are dead to it! The legalist will object and say, “wait a minute…without the Law won’t that make us sin all the more?” If we were simply separated from the Law, that might be true. But we are not simply dead to the Law, we are married to Another! Now that we are in relationship with Jesus Christ, we can actually bring forth spiritual fruit unto God!

Rom 7:5  For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 
Rom 7:6  But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. 

Notice the tense in verse 5. When we were under the law, our sinful passions were aroused and brought forth fruit unto death. Verse 6 begins with “but now”, showing that something has changed. We are now delivered from the law, and free to serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.

The rest of the chapter, Paul is going to make a defense of the law. As he has done in previous verses, he will as a rhetorical question, followed by an emphatic negative.

Rom 7:7  What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Paul’s opponents will try to paint him as one who denigrates the Law of Moses. What he will demonstrate however, is that the problem is not with the Law, the problem is with the sin nature (a.k.a. “the flesh” in Christian nomenclature). The function of the law is not to sanctify, but rather to show us what sin really is. By the law is the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20b). Romans 5:20 makes the shocking statement that the law entered “that the offence might abound.”

We will continue this study in our next post.

Grace or Debt? (Romans 4:4-8)

March 26, 2025

We continue to look at Paul’s exposition of justification by faith in today’s post. Paul has already cited the example of Abraham as one who was justified apart from works. Abraham is revered as the “father of faith” and now we will look at David as “Israel’s greatest king.” The one is famous for his faith and righteousness, the other infamous for a few great sins. It’s interesting that Paul chooses David’s failures rather than his great victories to make his point. Let’s see if we can follow Paul’s logic.

Rom 4:4  Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 

We see again Paul’s use of the word logizomai (translated as “reckoned” in the KJV). This is pretty straightforward. When one works and receives their wages, no grace is involved. After a 40-hour week you receive your paycheck. You may be thankful and love your job, but this is hardly considered a gracious act by your employer. You simply receive what you’ve earned. You were given what was owed to you. Grace is something altogether different.

Rom 4:5  But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Here is the language of grace. Abraham didn’t work for his righteousness, he simply believed in the LORD. On that basis, righteousness was “counted” (again “logizomai” in Greek) or credited to Abraham’s account. What may seem shocking at first glance is that we discover those who are justified. It’s not the godly, but rather, the ungodly! Those familiar with the Old Testament may immediately recall such scriptures as these:

Exo 23:7  Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked. 

Deu 25:1  If there be a controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked. 

The great expositor Warren Wiersbe remarked that “God justifies the ungodly-because there are no godly for Him to justify!”. Paul has already resolved this dilemma for us back in chapter 3 when he declared that God “set forth” Christ to be a propitiation for the remission of sins (Rom 3:25). Because Christ bore our sins on the Cross, God can now apply His righteousness to our account when we believe.

Rom 4:6  Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

Now Paul turns to David to strengthen the argument. Using the biblical principle of two witnesses, we now have an example from the law and the prophets/writings. Abraham’s faith was reckoned as righteousness by grace. Now we are going to see grace given to David apart from works. To make his point, Paul is going to quote from Psalm 32:1-2.

Rom 4:7  Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 
Rom 4:8  Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. 

To fully appreciate this, you must be familiar with the Old Testament and David’s story in particular. Most scholars believe that David penned this Psalm after his encounter with Nathan the prophet in 2 Samuel chapter 12. David had committed adultery with Bathsheba. She became pregnant, and David conspired to have her husband Uriah killed (Uriah is memorialized in Matthew’s genealogy of Christ in Matt 1:6). At least nine months later, God sent Nathan the prophet to confront David concerning his sins. I would encourage you to read the whole story in 2 Samuel 11 and 12, but for sake of time I will only cite this one reference here.

2Sa 12:13  And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD. And Nathan said unto David, The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.

David had committed at least two capital crimes (adultery and murder). Under the Law of Moses, there were no sacrifices for such willful sins. One could only expect the penalty of death. All David could do was cast himself upon the mercies of God. And look what happened…not only did God forgive David’s sin, He pardoned him from the death penalty! No wonder David’s heart erupted with praise to God in Psalm 32!

Paul has now given two great examples from the Old Testament showing righteousness apart from works. Abraham received what he did not deserve, and David didn’t get what he truly did deserve! You can either ask the LORD for a fair trial (bad idea!), or you can plead guilty and ask God for mercy. Because of what Christ did at Calvary, you and I can be righteous apart from works. I like to call that the “Great Exchange.”

2Co 5:21  For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him

Where is Boasting? (Romans 4:1-3)

March 25, 2025

In Romans 4, Paul is making the case for justification by faith. He will use two Old Testament examples to solidify his argument. He begins with Abraham.

Rom 4:1  What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? 
Rom 4:2  For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 

In Judaism, Abraham is held in the highest regard. As a matter of fact, three of the world’s largest religions trace their roots to Abraham. God promised in Genesis 12:2 that He would make Abraham’s name great, and history has vindicated this. The rabbis have such a high view of Abraham that some had the impression that he was justified by his good works. We can look back at Abraham’s offering of Isaac as the supreme example of obedience and he is known as “the friend of God.” (2 Chron 20:7, James 2:23).

But this is not what Paul chooses to focus on. Let’s follow his train of thought.

Rom 4:3  For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

The first question is of the utmost importance. It doesn’t matter what our opinions are, or even the opinions of those held in high esteem. But what do the scriptures say about the subject? That’s what matters! So, Paul directs us to Genesis 15 for the answer.

Gen 15:6  And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

This is the first mention of “belief” in the scriptures. This is not by accident; this is by design. People often wonder how folks were saved under the Old Covenant. My answer is, “the same way they are in the New Covenant.” People are saved by grace, through faith! Paul uses Abraham (the “father of faith”) to make this point. Abraham was not righteous because of his good deeds. He was declared to be righteous because he believed in the LORD!

The major theme of Romans is “the righteousness of God.” This is a righteousness that is bestowed upon us, apart from any goodness in us. Paul spends the first three chapters of Romans proving that the whole world is guilty before God and there are none righteous…no not one! The key word in Romans chapter 4 is the Greek word logizomai. The word is used 11 times in chapter 4. The KJV translators chose to translate this in a myriad of ways. They translated logizomai using the words, “counted”, “reckoned”, and “impute(d).” Those are all accurate ways to translate the word, but in my humble opinion, they obscure the argument Paul is trying to make. The NASB (New American Standard Bible) sought to alleviate this issue by the consistent translation of logizomai as “credited.”

Abraham believed God, and on that basis, righteousness was credited to him. “Credited” has more of a financial connotation whereas “imputed” carries more of a legal connotation, but both are accurate. Righteousness was “credited” to Abraham’s account. The reason Abraham can’t boast of his good works as a means of justification is because the righteousness was not his own! This righteousness was placed on his account, not because of works but because of faith! We will develop this further in our next post. Thanks for reading!